‘Social Manifesto’
The baffone’s photo placed
after Jesus.
He contradicted Zionist men
for humane ideals,
social ideals.
Zionist Work Camp.
Some workers were
driven towards
a larger society.
They fled.
The baffone was not always right,
like the other- an unnecessary derivative,
where followers said,
“My leader says and it should be right.”
He was a believer of absolutism,
his followers convinced by theory, reason, science.
Ego was transcended
and work prevailed, for all.
The followers were but restricted
for sex- out of the group, or
with a black sheep, to say.
Apolitical sex to be eschewed.
Followers ate their crumbs
between battles, and
slept with murderers.
It was a social manifesto,
there were no second decisions,
Compliance expected
for larger reasons.
They made a great mistake-
they, who expected kindness
were not kind themselves.
A philosophical antithesis,
political and then-“social”.
The baffone has led
the prodigious, accidental movement.
It was after many centuries.
Earlier, that was religion;
this is social.
Humans suffered beyond
anticipated. No liberals found.
Others that looked thought,
of their grand children
living in a violent state,
which has just started.
A man named Peng
was disappointed
about atrocities
upon followers,
who were simply
ready for the worst.
Thought alike many
like Peng.
Few like Marek died
as a follower of the baffone.
Others have to be prodded now.
Some still think about the baffone,
with the social manifesto.
Authority of that subject
seems negligible,
new subjects have grasped
and, taken over.
-Dhri Jyoti.
No comments:
Post a Comment